Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 13:06

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What’s next?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
George E. Smith, Nobel laureate who envisioned digital imagery, dies at 95 - The Washington Post
Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Thank you.
Which brand is the best home slippers in the Middle East?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
How did you become popular in school?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Fantasy Baseball SP Roundup 6/12: Nobody Beats Jay Mis - Pitcher List
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Exclusive | Kimberly-Clark Nears Roughly $3.5 Billion Sale of International Tissue Business - WSJ
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Meta in Talks for Scale AI Investment That Could Top $10 Billion - Bloomberg
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.